Moving to a new city or state can bring exciting opportunities, but if you share custody of a child, relocation can create legal challenges. Courts consider how a move affects the child and the existing custody arrangement before approving any changes. Understanding how Oklahoma law addresses relocation can help you prepare for potential obstacles.
Parental notification requirements
In Oklahoma, a custodial parent planning to move must provide written notice to the other parent at least 60 days before the relocation. The notice must include the new address, reason for the move, and proposed visitation changes. If the non-relocating parent objects, they can file a formal objection, leading to a court hearing. Failure to provide notice can impact future custody decisions.
How courts determine relocation approval
Judges consider several factors before allowing a relocation. The move must serve the child’s best interests rather than simply benefiting the relocating parent. Courts evaluate the distance, impact on the child’s relationship with both parents, educational opportunities, and the motives behind the move. If the relocation harms the child’s stability, the court may deny the request or modify custody.
Modifying custody and visitation
Relocation often leads to changes in custody and visitation schedules. If a judge approves the move, the non-relocating parent may receive extended holiday or summer visitation to maintain their relationship with the child. Virtual communication, such as video calls, may also become part of the custody arrangement. If the court denies the move, the custodial parent must choose between staying or relinquishing primary custody.
Planning for a smooth transition
Parents should discuss potential relocation early to find mutually agreeable solutions. Mediation can help create a new custody plan that accommodates both parents while prioritizing the child’s well-being. Courts encourage cooperative co-parenting, so demonstrating a willingness to compromise can positively influence the judge’s decision.